Yaɣili ŋɔ tariihi
12 Silimin gɔli October 2021
25 Silimin gɔli January 2021
20 Silimin gɔli October 2020
19 Silimin gɔli April 2020
12 Silimin gɔli April 2020
11 Silimin gɔli April 2020
Commenting out template entirely, given that the bot it fundamentally relies on was blocked
+9
Reverting back to version without update link (keeping the "no consensus" wording), then. The bot being blocked from article namespace at least means that the rest of the template is false
+10
Undid revision 950368913 by Pppery (talk) Best to stick with the version agreed upon after multiple discussions. Blocks enforce consensus, they don't create it.
+5
Reverting back to "not permitted in articles" from December 2018, which is what the bot being partially blocked from that namespace actually means
−5
8 Silimin gɔli April 2020
restore: this was the consensus version after Template_talk:Wikidata_list/Archive_1#"Not_permitted"_in_mainspace
+150
There is no consensus to display that message in articles; nor is "rvgf" meaningful
−150
Fixing the "for some reason" pointed out two edits ago; the lack of consensus to use Wikidata lists in articles does not mean that the bot doesn't update them, and therefore does not mean that the template should be hiddem
−10
rvgf: see previous discussion on talk
+158
For some reason, this error message hides the update link; is also shown to readers; plus it's inaccurate.
−158
13 Silimin gɔli March 2020
2 Silimin gɔli February 2020
try again (after some sandboxing)
+10
Undid revision 938706630 by Primefac (talk) - That seems to have broken all of the WiR lists such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Metrics/Wikidata_humans_no_gender
−3
1 Silimin gɔli February 2020
6 Silimin gɔli July 2019
restore - this error only appears on mainspace pages
+78
Maybe no consensus in the mainspace but everywhere else it is spam
−78
4 Silimin gɔli December 2018
Undid revision 871978643 by Fram (talk) No further discussion has generated any consensus for or against. Link to it otherwise.
+12
Undid revision 871977056 by RexxS (talk) And further discussions showed that these have a consensus against them. Change that, then change the error message
−12
If we're going to have an error message, let's have an accurate one. The close of the RfC specifically treated tables as different from running text.
+12
Undid revision 871941303 by Joe Roe (talk) Until it is discussed specifically foir tables, the general "not allowed" of the RfC applies. All discussions about Listeriabot have resulted in removal, meaning there is also de facto consensus against it
+66
Undid revision 871939064 by Fram (talk) ...says, "it might be worth discussing use in tables specifically – but not consensus regarding this has been reached in this discussion"
−66
Undid revision 871837419 by Joe Roe (talk) Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Wikidata Phase 2
+66
3 Silimin gɔli December 2018
2 Silimin gɔli December 2018
23 Silimin gɔli June 2018
17 Silimin gɔli June 2018
30 Silimin gɔli April 2018
9 Silimin gɔli October 2017
4 Silimin gɔli July 2017
8 Silimin gɔli March 2017
8 Silimin gɔli February 2017
30 Silimin gɔli January 2017
28 Silimin gɔli December 2016
21 Silimin gɔli November 2016
19 Silimin gɔli September 2016
29 Silimin gɔli January 2016
21 Silimin gɔli September 2015
make the text viewable here as well
−1
a break to balance long line of text against right float
m+5
explain data source
+48
needs a tracking category
+40